Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency three-custom-shader-material to v6 #511

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 13, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
three-custom-shader-material ^5.4.0 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

FarazzShaikh/THREE-CustomShaderMaterial (three-custom-shader-material)

v6.0.13

Compare Source

v6.0.12

Compare Source

v6.0.11

Compare Source

v6.0.10

Compare Source

v6.0.9

Compare Source

v6.0.8

Compare Source

v6.0.7

Compare Source

v6.0.2

Compare Source

v6.0.1

Compare Source

v6.0.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Deploy Preview for cientos-tresjs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 77b42a9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/cientos-tresjs/deploys/670bfb2388e01f00086b19c5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-511--cientos-tresjs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@alvarosabu
Copy link
Member

I'm not entirely sure about merging this one @andretchen0 @JaimeTorrealba is a major but their release notes are not really helpful in understanding if there is a breaking change 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant